<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MKThink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mkthink.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mkthink.com</link>
	<description>The IDEAS company for the built environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3520</link>
		<comments>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3520#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MKThink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkthink.com/?p=3520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A system of infrastructure that’s flexible and can be mobilized when the need arises would provide countless opportunities to deliver services more efficiently, sustainably, and inexpensively. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Will Godfrey</p>
<p>Planner</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Most of us view the urban landscape as a built-in-place environment, and so its various infrastructural components (housing, offices, waste management, utilities, etc.), as a result, tend to be constructed, immobile systems. Populations that inhabit these spaces, however, spike and dip and change, often in unpredictable ways—as do local economies, technology, and all types of things that influence how people live and what they need to function. I, myself have moved three times in the last year, and I probably had different needs than the person who lived at each place before me and the ones who have moved in after me. It follows that a system of infrastructure that’s flexible and can be mobilized when the need arises would provide countless opportunities to deliver services more efficiently, sustainably, and inexpensively. From a planner’s perspective, this ability to acquire a temporary stock of supportive systems would also allow cities and regions to follow smarter patterns of <em>permanent</em> development in accordance with long-term trends.</p>
<p>In some sectors, the concept of mobile infrastructure has already taken root with generally positive results. Among these are mobile command centers used by emergency and law enforcement services to collect information and distribute orders during a crisis. A number of these were employed in San Diego County to map the leading edges of the 2007 wildfires, and to organize the influx of fire crews called in from throughout the southwest. Portable classrooms, food trucks, modular pocket parks (see &#8220;<a title="Growing The Sidewalk" href="http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3046">Growing the Sidewalk</a>&#8220;), and even the port-a-potty also fit into this category of realized and integrated mobile infrastructures, but these are all relatively small-scale systems.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_3527" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 442px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3527" title="mobile-1" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mobile-1.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Hundreds of similar maps similar to this were drawn in real-time during the 2007 Cedar Fire by personnel in mobile command centers to assist with evacuations, and to focus defensive efforts around property and communities in the wildfire&#39;s path. This system was not fully in-place during the 2005 San Diego wildfires and the losses were much greater in that case.</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p><div id="attachment_3530" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 586px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3530" title="mobile-2" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mobile-2.jpg" alt="" width="576" height="431" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Food trucks have become a common sight throughout the Bay Area. Some have stable locations, like the taco trucks along International Boulevard in Oakland, and some cycle through several locations or just roam like the Off the Grid caravan</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"> As a more theoretical exercise, it’s interesting to think about how the concept can be scaled <em>up </em>to address existing planning challenges. Massive sporting events like the Olympics and World Cup have become a recurring instance where a region must be able to accommodate and support a huge spike in population for a very limited time. The recent pattern has been for the host city to build up from nothing or redevelop an entire neighborhood of housing into a central village for the event, with the hope that it attracts permanent residents after the crowds are gone. Athens for example, constructed such an environment for the 2004 Olympics—an inland suburban development with the capacity for 10,000. Today it stands almost completely vacant and unmaintained, a largely useless addition to one of the world’s most historic and beautiful cities. Again, the 2010 World Cup in South Africa was overall a success for the Country, but even so, vacancies in the retail districts that were developed in Cape Town remain very high, and the residential property market is flooded, with a slow recovery projected. (As a side note and to its credit, the World Cup has recognized this issue and attempted to minimize overdevelopment of host cities by packaging up their smaller stadium venues after the event, and relocating them to parts of the developing world that can put them to regular use.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p><div id="attachment_3531" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 930px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3531" title="mobile-3" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mobile-3.jpg" alt="" width="920" height="286" /><p class="wp-caption-text">These images are of the Olympic Village constructed in Athens for the 2004 Olympic Games, several years later. The development is quite dilapidated and underused, typical results of short-term planning.</p></div>
<p>The cruise ships that dock occasionally at the piers near the MK Think office prompted a conversation about these patterns of development, and suggested the solution of mobile supportive systems serving as modular city chunks. Shipping by sea is among the most efficient and simple ways to transport just about anything, and each of these cruise ships can accommodate several thousand people comfortably with all the amenities of a luxury hotel. Three or four of these parked on the coast of Rio in 2016 would serve the same function as a constructed residential and commercial village, but have the ability to move along to any number of places after the boom dies down unlike a permanent development. In between massive sporting events, a single cruise ship or similar vessel could serve as housing for seasonal or temporary industries in remote locations, such as oil drilling or mining operations. It could be customized as office space and parked near a city that would like to slow down or pause its downtown growth. Or it could also fill a more humanitarian role and provide shelter to displaced victims of natural disasters or war. The list of possibilities seems to go on and on, but the concept doesn’t quite mesh with most people’s idea of how cities grow or should end up looking. The fact is there will always be new planning challenges in the world, and not all of them will require a permanent solution so it’s at least worth considering leased or borrowed solutions with as many upsides as mobile infrastructures have. Thinking about and understanding space in this way may offer new means of addressing a variety of serious problems more quickly (and less expensively) than years of design and construction, while at the same time conserving resources otherwise spent on logistics, building materials, and energy.</p>
<div id="attachment_3532" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 586px"><img class="size-full wp-image-3532" title="mobile-4" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mobile-4.jpg" alt="" width="576" height="327" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Queen Victoria docked at one of San Francisco&#39;s many piers. The piers have been put to alternate uses recently, but they&#39;re still perfectly suited to their original purpose.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3520/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Russell Racing Drivers School</title>
		<link>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3490</link>
		<comments>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3490#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MKThink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkthink.com/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[••••• &#8220;Pole Position&#8221; Infineon Raceway Sonoma, CA 2007 Challenge Infineon Raceway is a stark departure from the otherwise calm serenity of Sonoma’s rolling landscape. Here it’s about speed, racing and being loud. It’s about metal and machine. Testosterone and technology. An odd combination of adrenaline and octane where humans and their machines push each other]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="main_view">
<div class="window">
<div class="image_reel">
<a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/JR1.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/JR2.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/JR3.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/JR4.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/JR5.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="paging"><a href="#" rel="1">•</a><a href="#" rel="2">•</a><a href="#" rel="3">•</a><a href="#" rel="4">•</a><a href="#" rel="5">•</a></div>
</div>
<div class="project_info">
<div class="project_description">
<p>
&#8220;Pole Position&#8221;<br />
<br />
<strong>Infineon Raceway</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Sonoma, CA </strong><br />
<br />
<strong> 2007 </strong>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="project_body">
<h3>Challenge </h3>
<p>Infineon Raceway is a stark departure from the otherwise calm serenity of Sonoma’s rolling landscape. Here it’s about speed, racing and being loud. It’s about metal and machine. Testosterone and technology. An odd combination of adrenaline and octane where humans and their machines push each other to the limit and sometimes past it. Extending the excitement of the track to the classroom and doing so in a cost effective manner were the key drivers for this project’s design and approach. </p>
<h3>Approach </h3>
<p>The aesthetic and sensory attributes of the design embody a not-so-lightly veiled reference to racing and high performance driving: metal, glass, motion, curves and color. Oh, it’s environmentally friendly too.</p>
<h3>Results</h3>
<p>The new Jim Russell Racing Drivers School is comprised of a learning and demonstration environment, media center, café, and lounge overlooking the track at Turn 1 of this storied raceway. The building solution successfully met the project goals &#8211; to create an affordable, high-performance teaching facility to support and expand the Jim Russell Racing Drivers School and its driving skills programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3490/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission Creek Sports Park</title>
		<link>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3469</link>
		<comments>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3469#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MKThink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkthink.com/?p=3469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[••• Kayak House and Maintenance Pavilion San Francisco, CA 2008 Challenge What can a city do with the odd, neglected space under a freeway? In San Francisco where an abandoned three-acre parcel occupies space below several freeway off-ramps, the answer is Mission Creek Sports Park. It is a “whimsical yet functional community destination”, reports San]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="main_view">
<div class="window">
<div class="image_reel">
<a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/MC1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/MC2.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="#"><img src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/projects/MC3.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="paging"><a href="#" rel="1">•</a><a href="#" rel="2">•</a><a href="#" rel="3">•</a></div>
</div>
<div class="project_info">
<div class="project_description">
<p>
<strong>Kayak House and Maintenance Pavilion</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>San Francisco, CA </strong><br />
<br />
<strong> 2008 </strong>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="project_body">
<h3>Challenge </h3>
<p>What can a city do with the odd, neglected space under a freeway?   In San Francisco where an abandoned three-acre parcel occupies space below several freeway off-ramps, the answer is Mission Creek Sports Park.   It is a “whimsical yet functional community destination”, reports San Francisco Chronicle columnist, John King. </p>
<h3>Approach </h3>
<p>Who says that utilitarian buildings need to be boring?   MKThink’s focus was the creation of two simple yet dramatic structures.  The Kayak House securely stores 20 human-powered watercraft and its eye-catching design, with marine grade wood slats and translucent blue poly-carbonate skin.  It pays homage to the historic wooden ships that used to ply Mission Bay.  A Maintenance Pavilion, the underlying structure of which is a cost-effectively pre-engineered metal building frame, borrows a similar exterior vocabulary and stylishly houses public restrooms and park &#038; recreation equipment.  Serving as counterpoints to one another, the two structures challenge the preconception that utilitarian structures must be boring—something to be hidden rather than celebrated.  Here both structures add dramatic and playful flair to an urbanscape otherwise dominated by freeway fly-overs, and serve as visual anchor points to the park.  Both feature fanciful skins that reference the site’s nautical context.   </p>
<p><em>“…this park beneath freeway ramps is a surprising joy…add a kayak storage building by MKThink that suggests a billowing tent of translucent blue plastic, and the result is genuinely unique. In other words, the kind of spot that makes a redevelopment district start to feel like a real neighborhood.”   </em></p>
<p>- John King <br />
“Decade in review: Top 10 in S.F. Architecture” <br />
The San Francisco Chronicle, January 2010 </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3469/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panoramography</title>
		<link>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3431</link>
		<comments>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3431#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MKThink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkthink.com/?p=3431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new wave of immersive, 360 degree photography called panoramography has grown steadily in popularity and is set to revolutionize the way we do our work as architects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<div>
<div>
<p> <img class="size-full wp-image-3435 alignnone" title="image002" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/image002.png" alt="" width="320" height="200" /><img class="size-full wp-image-3436 alignnone" title="image003" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/image003.png" alt="" width="273" height="144" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>by Brandon Baunach, LEED Green Assc.</p>
<p>Architect</p>
<p>A new wave of immersive, 360 degree photography called panoramography has grown steadily in popularity and is set to revolutionize the way we do our work as architects. A bit of background: up until recently, panoramography required extremely expensive equipment. The new era of mobile apps has opened the gate with which to produce these images by using a software stitching technique that automatically merges multiple images. As an example, Microsoft’s Photosynth (<a href="http://photosynth.net/">http://photosynth.net/</a>) app make quick time of what used to be a very difficult process. But only in the past few weeks did a major breakthrough open up the possibilities of panoramography. This breakthrough comes in the form of a device that will take a high quality 360 degree image or video without having to merge together multiple images. The devices now available, either as a stand-alone camera or as an iPhone add-on, allow users to take full 360 degree views from floor to ceiling with one click of the shutter.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This tool is potentially extremely powerful for architects. Why? Here&#8217;s a scenario: I&#8217;ve recently been working on a school project where the project is a renovation of an existing building. As hard as I have tried, I always seem to miss the opportunity to take that important photo that would save me a trip out to the school to take additional images. This is a scenario faced on any renovation project or tenant improvement. Of course, if I was able to take an image of every room floor to ceiling I would be able to look at any part of the building just as I’m able to view any part of the outside of the building in Google StreetView (<a href="http://maps.google.com/intl/en/help/maps/streetview/">http://maps.google.com/intl/en/help/maps/streetview/</a>) . The result of using panoramography as an observation tool is I cut down on my need for field visits, I get more accurate drawings because I can always refer to the images, and ultimately, I save the firm lots of money.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So, what’s available on the market to take these images? On a consumer level, the best solutions are Tamaggo (<a href="http://www.tamaggo.com/">http://www.tamaggo.com</a>) and Kotego ( <a href="http://kogeto.com/">http://kogeto.com/</a> ). Kotego is commercially available right now and comes as an attachment for the iPhone 4 and 4S for $79. Tamaggo is not yet available, but claims to be out in two months for a price of $199. The Katego is designed for video while the Tamaggo is a still camera. I purchased the Katego and am waiting impatiently to try it out. But I will most likely want to get a Tamaggo , as well, for its superior 14Megapixel picture clarity.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For cool examples of panoramography, see:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kogeto.com/dotspots/">http://www.kogeto.com/dotspots/</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3431/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workplace: Breaking Out of the Cube</title>
		<link>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3403</link>
		<comments>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3403#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MKThink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkthink.com/?p=3403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[United States workers spent an average of 1,749 hours in the office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>by Tiffany Chen</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><img class="wp-image-3406 aligncenter" title="1" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/1-733x1024.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="614" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United States workers spent an average of <strong>1,749 hours </strong>in the office in 2010, or nearly 30% of their waking hours.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Where does the MKThink team spend 30% of our time a year?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><img class="wp-image-3407 aligncenter" title="2" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="505" /></strong></p>
<p align="center">[1500 Sansome Street in 1965<em> – </em><a href="http://wx4.org/to/foam/sp/san_fran/cisco.html"><em>Wx4</em></a>]<em></em></p>
<p align="center"><em> </em></p>
<p>MKThink is located on the top floor of the old State Belt roundhouse, just off the Embarcadero in San Francisco. Our view of the pier is uninhibited by office partitions; spaces are delineated by mobile whiteboards and shelving units rather than cubicles. The open floor plan encourages the interaction of MKThink’s three studios – Innovation, Strategy, and Architecture – by opening up the flow of conversation and ideas through visual and audio connections.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><strong><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3408" title="3" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/3-300x267.png" alt="" width="300" height="267" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Theories on how to reconfigure and optimize the modern office abound, but they all center on maintaining the balance between <strong>people, environment, and business</strong>. Here are a few ideas for ways to approach these three components of the workplace.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><img class="size-medium wp-image-3409 aligncenter" title="4" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/4-300x165.png" alt="" width="300" height="165" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ray Oldenburg writes about the existence of the third place in his book <em>The Great Good Place</em>. He distinguishes it from first places (home) and second places (work); it is a space where the community gathers naturally and interacts casually – think coffee houses, main streets, and public parks. In an office setting, providing a space separate from the central working hub where people can pause and meet could create third places that allows for breaks in the constant flow of productivity and encourages the sharing of ideas in an informal environment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><img class="size-medium wp-image-3410 aligncenter" title="5" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/5-300x84.png" alt="" width="300" height="84" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In a recent<em> </em>article titled “The Rise of the New Groupthink”, Susan Cain argues that solitude, not collaboration, is the genesis of creative work. Constant brainstorming sessions interrupt and inhibit the crucial process of personally working through a problem and coming up with a creative solution. Cain suggests a more balanced approach towards the office environment that allows for small group meetings but does not impose on the individual’s workspace.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>An office should provide a flexible space to experiment with different set-ups and components, where individuals can easily flow from group meetings, to individual work, to small interactions. Open central office plans eliminate the need to define physical or mental edges – peripheral, rather than tunnel, vision is developed and allows for a vibrant experience of the whole space.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><img class=" wp-image-3414 aligncenter" title="6" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/63-1024x832.png" alt="" width="819" height="666" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-3415 aligncenter" title="7" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/7.png" alt="" width="409" height="168" /></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A business’s office is a chance to tell its story through a physical space. Imbuing an office with a unique identity gives it a sense of place and makes people feel they belong there. To develop company culture, the office could provide ways for employees to Own their personal workspaces and have different ways of showcasing their work.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-3416 aligncenter" title="8" src="http://www.mkthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/8.jpg" alt="" width="504" height="219" /></p>
<p align="center"><strong><br /> </strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>To figure out which approach best suits a specific environment, MKThink performs a quantitative evaluation of the physical space that works in tandem with a qualitative assessment of how users inhabit that environment. Moving forward, guiding cultural and design principles determine the development of opportunity areas, ultimately resulting in a space that best serves the needs of its users and enhances their everyday experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mkthink.com/archives/3403/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

