Preview by Thumbshots.com Thumbnail Screenshots by Thumbshots

San Francisco’s Aquatic Park




by E. Chloe´ Lauer
Director of Strategy

“San Francisco attracted 16 million visitors in 2007, according to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco), and ranks consistently in the top 100 destination cities of the world (http://blog.euromonitor.com/2011/01/euromonitor-internationals-top-city-destinations-ranking.html).

In an ongoing series, we’ll be exploring the architectural, cultural, and environmental attributes that come together to make a place like San Francisco such a popular destination.

Aquatic Park in San Francisco is a case in point. The beauty is undeniable. Let’s look below the surface to identify how architecture, culture, and the environment are intersecting to create such a memorable and spectacular place.

Culture:

On a warm and sunny fall day, San Francisco bustles with the energy of delighted locals out for their morning jogs and bike rides passing eager tourists seeking out the world famous sites. Health and fitness are in the air as the Nike marathoners head from Union Square through the city, along the Bay and through Golden Gate Park, celebrating a big accomplishment as they reach Ocean Beach. On Treasure Island, revelers feast on live music all weekend. That’s just a taste of the range of happenings that the city offers on an typical weekend.

Architecture:

The variety of building type and scale create interest and dimension for the viewer. In the foreground, the Balclutha Ship’s masts stand out, bringing texture to the clear blue sky. The middle ground neighborhood scale 2-3 story homes and apartment buildings allow taller apartment buildings on Russian and Nob Hills to the right and Coit Tower on Telegraph Hill to frame the Financial District’s skyline in the background. The TransAmerica Building’s distinctive shape gives the viewer an icon to focus on.

Environment:

The incredible culture and majestic architecture wouldn’t be nearly as compelling if it weren’t for the physical setting: the crystalline sky reflecting in the glistening bay. Without the hills, the skyline would lack interest. Really, the environment is the basis for the development of San Francisco’s culture and architecture. People are attracted to the edges of land masses as they meet the world’s massive water bodies: over half of the world’s population lives within 120 miles of a coast (1998). http://www.oceanservice.noaa.gov/websites/retiredsites/natdia_pdf/3hinrichsen.pdf\

Stay tuned for the next installment on San Francisco: World Class City Equation.

Architecture & Enterprise: Potential & Pitfalls


LESSONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF PROJECT FROG

by Mark Miller

MKthink CEO | Innovation Studio Director

Introduction: The Entrepreneurial Accident:

Our great architect-as-entrepreneur experiment started out by accident through rather accidental means. The genesis of Project FROG, arguably the nations leading clean modular building technology company, arose from a desire for a bit of PR. In 2005 we met with the publishers at Metropolis regarding our firm’s work and its suitability for representation in a trendy, high profile issue focused on education. The in-creasingly glazed look of the editor indicated that my pitch (for a story about what I thought were the most exciting architectural projects the world needed to know about) was not working. Verified by the tone of her “got anything else” I knew I was running low on options. I responded with, “there is a more confidential assignment that we are working on…but it has never been shared.” The editor looked up and leaned forward. “We have been working on the problem of 300,000 classrooms in the US and we have a prototype that looks like this ( sketched furiously on a hotel stationary pad).” She was in. Granting us good coverage if we published with them first, our ideas would be published. The only problem, we had no images, only basic research and a bit of brainstorming by the office over beers on a Friday. We had 30 days before the reporter with a deadline was to visit our office.

The resulting article resulted in attention and inquiry from around the world. We were excited. We dodged, bought time, researched and sketched more. The NY 2012 Olympic Committee called, we sketched a bit more. Then came the Tsunami in Indonesia followed a few months later by Katrina and we realized that we were in the center of a global problem with no viable solution.

Transforming the concept into a company:

In 2006, we realized that we were well out of our safe range. Fortunately we reached out for technologi-cal and business advice. On the technology front, our saving grace was the connection with two brilliant Silicon Valley talents: Manley Tantuico, an industrial designer and Bekir Begovic, a metal fabricator. Af-ter they recovered from their amusement at our overly complex architectural approach, they patiently explained the obvious benefits of an industrial design approach: Strive for a clean, simple and repeatable solution made of as few distinct parts as possible, then organize the product into pieces, parts, compo-nents and assemblies. Though obvious to an industrial designer this was revolutionary to us. Soon to follow was the introduction to relevant software tools that support this methodology.

Financially, we were found ourselves in even more foreign territory. The “problem” (i.e. the Market) we were addressing was large. We had a mission supported by the passion of some very talented creative minds. We had the financial capabilities of a modest-sized, first generation architecture firm. So we did what came naturally to us, we sold units. Within a few weeks we had two big contracts to build two campuses using our system. The problem was that we had quite a few product elements to finish, very tight project schedules, and understanding, yet demanding clients.

We were able to capitalize a new company through a seed funding round of investment capital from a close network of friends, family and associates. We recruited a very small business team and survived the completion of the first round of contracts. We hung on, and were able to raise a large round of fund-ing from Rockport Capital Partners, a Boston and Sand Hill venture capital firm, just as the fall of Leh-man Bros marked the country’s decent into recession. I awoke to find myself the CEO of a venture-capital-backed company. The real estate market was collapsing and we needed to get down to the busi-ness of creating project confidence and acting like a proper growth-oriented commercial enterprise. My vocabulary had to quickly expand beyond the realm of building to include vernacular like “liquidation preferences,” “option pools”, “exit strategies”, “pipeline”, “venture debt” and “optics.” I had to take a Myers-Briggs tests, have “key-man” insurance and see legal fees approach 10% of our annual spending.

We were in a brave new world but the achievements were compelling and the enthusiasm of the staff was motivating. Our belief was that we could change the way buildings were built. Energy consumption would drop 40%. Projects could be completed in weeks and months, not years. Schools would be healthier providing environments that would support and stimulate the brain’s ability to retain and process knowledge. Our team began achieving these goals. Crissy Field Center (San Francisco), the Watkinson School (Hartford, Conn) and Jacoby Creek (Arcadia, CA) exemplified this vision though the first genera-tion of post VC funding solutions.

The company was growing as were the issues. The investors determined that growth would be best managed by a professionally trained business team so a new CEO was brought in to manage the growth and expand the funding. I began a transition out of operating and actively engaging with Project FROG and returned to the leadership team at MKThink.

Marina Theater

“Restoring a Neighborhood Treasure”

San Francisco, CA

2008

Challenge

How can you secure the economic viability of the highly-desirable small neighborhood theater in today’s milieu of big chain multiplexes?   Changing market dynamics have forced single-screen cinemas to evolve in order to survive, both as successful enterprises and neighborhood amenities.  While the original 1928-built single-screen theater failed in the early 2000’s at the time when corporate multiplexes had crowded an already tight market using lower margins and greater marketing reach, the community still desired a first-run local theater.  San Francisco’s Neighborhood Theater Foundation, the building owner, and a new theater operator each had different metrics for the success of this project.

Approach

MKThink and the building owner took an inclusive approach to work closely with the Neighborhood Theater Foundation and City to help negotiate a solution that would be economically viability in today’s multiplex world, yet resurrect the Marina Theater.  Acting as architect and part-liaison, MKThink developed plans that met the economic thresholds and local interests.

Solution

MKThink completely renovated the building and reworked the plans to accommodate a two-screen theater and a major retail anchor tenant.  The historic building façade was cleaned and restored with dramatic lighting befitting a center-stage building in this neighborhood.  This solution was embraced by the neighborhood community and unanimously approved by the San Francisco Planning Commission. The theater reopened and resumed its important role as a community focal point.

“It’s incredible to have this great gathering space returned to our community”
- Nikki Tankursley, Marina resident

RoundhouseOne: A Strategic Offering from MKThink

 

Overcome the negative impact of high cost operations caused by inefficient facilities through the smart application of information and analytics.

RoundhouseOne represents the integration of 12 years of MKThink’s solution-based strategic services with proprietary 4Daptive Technology to provide a unique “4 Dimensional” value analysis of Cultural, Architectural and Environmental performance over Time. The result is a consensus-building, decision-making tool designed to improve the alignment of both operational and capital expenditures with your institution’s mission.

4Daptive technology is a powerful new digital platform developed to enhance MKThink services. 4Daptive features a comprehensive database, analytic engine, user interface, and feedback loop to provide clients with a complete picture of hidden value within the organization’s assets.

Value

Cost Reduction

Realize operating cost savings through lower facility operating and maintenance costs, reduced personnel costs, and lower energy costs

Cost Avoidance

Lower future operating and capital costs associated with growth through higher, more effective utilization of current assets

Revenue Increase

Increase student performance, pedagogical opportunities, and student capacity by optimizing use of physical assets

To learn more visit roundhouseone.com or contact:

Laurence Morgan
Executive Vice President, Sales
415.288.3395
morgan@roundhouseone.com

Crissy Field Center

San Francisco, CA
2008

San Francisco has a new icon thanks to the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and the National Park Service. Project FROG’s latest smart building is located on the beautiful San Francisco waterfront at Crissy Field’s East Beach. The new interim home for Crissy Field Center demonstrates model practices in sustainability which further advances their environmental education programs for local youth. With LEED Gold certification underway, the 7,436 sf state-of-the-art facility will be one of the most technologically-advanced, energy-efficient buildings in existence and will adhere to the most stringent green certification standards. The Center features high-performance classrooms, a science lab, an art room, administrative space as well as a cafe.